How to choose a hotel in Sharm el-Sheikh: what to look for?
From messages by 3 participants in 2 sources · Last activity: 5 days ago
From messages by 3 participants in 2 sources · Last activity: 5 days ago
TL;DR
When choosing a hotel in Sharm el-Sheikh, prioritize reef quality, green territory size, and sea access. Budget hotels often have good beaches but poor service; luxury resorts offer great amenities but the sea may be far or shallow.
For a stay with a beautiful reef, good food, and polite staff, consider Sultan Gardens or Grand Rotana.
Coral Hills can be a budget option if you book a renovated room: all-inclusive reportedly cost about RUB 3,200 per day in March. Reviews mention varied dinners including tuna, beef, liver, and crab. The hotel provides transport to three beaches, including Terrazina and another sandy beach; Faraana Beach was reportedly under renovation.
Consider Pickalbatros Palace for its good water park, numerous pools, enjoyable food, and service without reported requests for extra payment at reception. Its reef is considered average rather than exceptional; tipping may help secure more attentive restaurant service. There is very little to explore outside the property, as the hotel-side promenade is short. Wind can lead to a red flag at sea, though the resort has plenty of pools.
If you want to go out beyond the resort, this is feasible from any of the areas under consideration: low-cost taxis booked through the inDrive app make it easy to reach places for a walk.
For evening walks outside the resort, consider hotels within a 10–15-minute walk of the Old Town, with its mosque, markets, pharmacies, and cafés. One review of a nearby 4-star property reports warm, very clean water, a small reef, gentle sea entry, and fish including morays and rays; however, its rooms and food may be closer to a 3-star standard, so check recent reviews for these points separately.
Comparison: Park Regency has an amazing reef and a nice hotel, but Rotana was preferred overall — Park Regency had more downsides with the room and beach; grounds are lovely and food is good.
Grand Oasis is a more interesting hotel than Faraana, but Faraana has a better location and direct sea entry from the shore — choice depends on priorities.
If easy sandy sea entry matters more than house-reef snorkeling, commonly suggested options are Novotel Beach and Maritim: they are valued for comfortable beach access, but not for a notable reef.
Sunrise Remal Beach is worth considering if you want a strong reef without going all the way to the highest price tier: reviews praise its abundant fish, decent swimming area, solid food, and good service. It is described as usually cheaper than White Hills but about 50,000 more expensive than Novotel Beach; travelers also call it newer and more compact than Monte Mare.
Large, green hotel grounds signal a well-funded, well-maintained resort — maintaining greenery in the desert is expensive. However, luxury resorts often lack direct sea access: you may need to walk far through shallow water or stick to the pool. Everything on-site (pharmacy, souvenirs) is significantly overpriced, and outside the gates there's nothing but desert.
Budget hotels are often located right by a good beach and reef, but service, food quality, and room standards tend to be noticeably lower. It's a classic trade-off: either sea access or comfort.
The reef is the top priority for snorkeling enthusiasts — Egypt's main draw. Before booking, read guest reviews specifically about the reef. Domina Coral Bay is known for an outstanding reef with moray eels, rays, and occasional manta ray sightings.
From the Rif Oasis hotel group, Rif Oasis Blue Bay is worth considering. Travelers who stayed at both properties in the chain generally preferred Blue Bay.
Before booking, decide on your vacation style: relaxed beach holiday or active exploration. In Sharm el-Sheikh there's rarely a perfect middle ground — each hotel type has significant trade-offs, so setting priorities in advance is essential.